Judges Evaluation Form – Research Forum
Evaluation Form
- Frank Webber Prize for Student Research
Research Trainee: Board #
Reviewer’s Name:
Grade on the scale for each section; with 1 = (Poor); rate the student’s presentations on the following criteria:
POSTER ORGANIZATION è 5 points each (possible 15pts)
| Organization | Is the presentation logically arranged? Does the information flow from beginning to end? | ||
| Figures and Tables | Are figures and tables easy to read and interpret?
Are titles and legends appropriate and informative? |
||
| Overall Display | Does the organization style and format foster communication of the investigator’s work? |
Organization Sub-Total: _____
POSTER CONTENT è 10 points each (possible 50pts)
| Abstract | Does the abstract provide a concise summary of the work presented? | |
| Introduction | Does the introduction provide sufficient background to understand the problem under study? | |
| Methods and Procedures | Are protocols clearly defined? Are proper controls used? | |
| Results | Are results clearly described? Do tables and figures convey data efficiently? | |
| Conclusion and Discussion | Are conclusions supported by the data? Is the significance of the finding discussed? |
Content Sub-Total: _____
RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS / KNOWLEDGE è 20 points each (possible 60pts)
| Response to Questions | Are responses to questions direct and insightful?
|
|
| Understanding of Work | Does the presenter understand the technical and
conceptual aspects, context, and implications of the work? |
|
| Discussion | Can the presenter discuss relevant issues clearly?
|
Response Sub-Total: _____
RESULTS è 25 points
| Significance of Results | Are the results of the research significant? |
Results Sub-Total: _____
TOTAL SCORE: _______
(Possible total of 150pts)